Today in Horrible Sports Platitudes.

The Roger Federer Retirement Committee.

Man, how great was that tennis match last night?  I actually think more people would like watching tennis if they gave it a shot, and by watching tennis I mean pretty much just the last round or two of premium events.  The finals can be a bit like watching the back nine on Masters Sunday.  Eventually, I’d like to see one of these showdowns in person.  The U.S. Open was a real hot spot for celebs this year.  Diddy was there.  Some NBA guys, Bradley Cooper (swoon), Olivia Munn, Ben Stiller, Bar Refaeli, etc.  It’s a place to be seen.  Flushing, right across from the home of the Mets, the nexus of New York.

Anyway, I’d want to go and watch in person to get a handle on how hard these guys are really ripping the ball.  Television dulls everything down to a stock speed with no perspective, so you can’t really tell.  The ball could be going 40 mph, or 140 mph, and you’d hardly know the difference.  And, what I appreciate most about the tennis guys is that are they are just putting it all into every shot.  You almost always have to hit a nearly perfect shot to win a point, so it’s like a soccer shootout where every player is going top-corner.

I think for actual tennis fans, it’s a pretty ridiculous time to be watching just in terms of level of play.  You’ve still got Federer, possibly the greatest ever, and he got bumped to the side a bit by Nadal who was uncommonly fast and got to every ball and now there’s Djokovic on this historic run where he appears to cover even more court and hit the ball with more authority than Nadal.  Unless you are Andy Murray, you should love tennis right now.  And, the high level of play has led to several epic matches, sets, even points.  Did I watch the 5th set of the Djokovic/Federer semi-final?  Yeah, I did.

It’s a universal opinion that these matches are great.  Instant classics, whatever you want to call them.  The issue I have is the inevitability of someone trotting out the old, “It’s a shame someone had to lose.”  No.  That’s wrong.  Losing made the entire thing possible.  Stop being so soft.

You hear this all the time after great games or events.  Oh, both teams deserved it.  Both sides played their best.  Blah, blah, blah.  This is what the winners say when they are trying to sound humble.  When an observer says it, they just come across as having no backbone.

Here’s my real issue.  I don’t believe people when they say that.  I don’t believe people who say they didn’t have a rooting interest.  Even if you’ve never seen Nadal or Djokovic before, if you tuned in last night and stayed tuned in you must have been pulling for someone.  Either you immediately went to Nadal because he was trailing.  Or, maybe you took Djokovic because you’re a front-runner, or thought his girlfriend was hot.  Maybe you liked one of their sneaker choices, but I guarantee you weren’t just watching for the sake of athletics.  If that was the case, the driving range at Augusta would be as exciting as Amen Corner.

What about the notion that the fans at a big tennis event will actually flip-flop?  If two guys are battling it out, regardless of who is ahead, they always want that fifth set.  Isn’t that just cheering for tennis?  Well no, that’s cheering for prolonged excitement.  That’s akin to my horse in the race theory, where having your teams play big games is actually more gratifying than the end result of winning a championship.  The fans on the most basic level want to be entertained, but the only reason the match is entertaining to that degree is because the players are in pursuit of an outcome.  One of them will definitively win and the other will lose.

It’s all right to try to win.  Believe me, if it wasn’t for the competition you’d never see these things achieved in sports.  And, after a great match, it’s OK if you crown a winner.  Because, there’s no shame in winning, but just as importantly there’s no shame in losing.  That’s what we’re saying, right?  Well, he played too well to be called the loser, but that was the outcome. Get over it.

Mike Singletary, Thoughts:



7 thoughts on “Today in Horrible Sports Platitudes.

  1. I watched most of Federer-Djokovic and then part of the final. I was pretty amazed at how good these guys are and I also desperately wanted to see them in person although I admit that reading the DFW article on Federer encouraged this feeling.

    How scary would it be to have these guys launching serves at you at 120 mph? I say, very scary.

  2. yeah, I feel like there was a stretch of years where I hardly watched tennis, like from the end of Sampras until recently and it seems the level of play has sky rocketed. of course, i have no real proof of that. I’ll just assume it’s technology.

  3. You know what I was thinking is that the humans have caught up with the technology. It doesn’t matter how hard you hit the ball, these guys can get to it. So it’s brought angle and spin back into the game, except on a higher plane than it existed before.

    Rand, thoughts?

  4. haha Singletary will take 10 over 11… he was fired right?

    there’s been some talk that they’ve slowed down the surfaces – even wimbledon- which allows the guys to get to more balls… some claim that all the surfaces play too similarly now… but regardless of that, yes these guys are athletic freaks – at least the very top guys are. I mean shot after shot rafa and novak are able to move around the court with lightening speed and fire off almost impossible shots while sliding and doing a split that would certainly rip my groin in half. And the technology, specifically the strings, has changed and made a lot of these shots possible too. So its really both technology and human.

  5. CAN’T DO IT! It’s really a shame he couldn’t get the 49ers turned around. Then again, who can with Alex Smith at QB.

    I’ll give the past some credit with tennis. Sampras was really good, I never saw Bjorg or McEnroe or Nastase, but these three guys are ridiculous. Djokovic lost 3 times in one year. 3! And he won 3 of the 4 major tournaments. He beat Nadal like a drum, who now beats Federer like a drum. And Federer has made it to something like 32 straight Grand Slam Quarterfinals, a streak that included something like 28 straight Grand Slam semifinals. Before this year, Nadal and Federer had won something like 27 of the last 32 Grand Slam events.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s